Cheating Around Ankle Rocker (Dorsiflexion) in Gait: A cause for plantar foot pain.
/don’t miss this case video
don’t miss this case video
The Power of Observation: Part 2
Let’s take a closer look at yesterdays post and the findings. If you are just picking up here, the post will be more meaningful if you go back and read it.
The following are some explanations for what you were seeing:
torso lean to left during stance phase on L?
if he has a L short leg, he will need to clear right leg on swing phase. We have spoken of strategies around a short leg in another post. This gentleman employs 2 of the 5 strategies; torso lean is one of them
increased progression angle of both feet?
Remember he has femoral retroversion. You may have read about retrotorsion here. He has limited internal rotation o both thighs and must create the requisite 4-6 degrees necessary to walk. He does this by spinning his foot out (rotating externally).
decreased arm swing on L?
This is most likely cortical, as he seems to have decreased proprioception on both legs during 1 leg standing. Proprioception feeds to the cerebellum, which in turn fires axial extensors through connections with the vestibular system. Diminished input can lead to flexor dominance (and extensors not firing). Note the longer stride forward on the right leg compared to the left with less hip extension (yes, we know, a side view would be helpful here).
circumduction of right leg?
This is the 2nd strategy for getting around that L short leg.
clenched fist on L?(esp when standing on either leg)
see the decreased arm swing section. This is a subtle sign of flexor dominance, which appears to be greater on the right.
body lean to R during L leg standing?
This is again to compensate for the L short leg. He has very mild weakness of the left hip abductors as well, more when moving or using them in a synergistic fashion (ie functional weakness) than to manual testing.
Well, what do you think? Now you can see how important the subtle is and that gait analysis may complex than many think.
We are and we remain, the Geeky Guru’s of Gait: The Gait Guys
OK, quiz time. The Powers of Observation.
Perhaps you have been following us for a while, perhaps you are just finding us for the 1st time. Here is some back ground on this footage. Let’s test you observation skills.
Watch this gait clip a few times and come back here to read on.
This triathlete presented with low chronic low back pain of about 1 years duration. The pain gets worse as the day goes on; it is best in the early am. Running and biking do not alter its intensity or character and swimming makes it worse. Rest and analgesics provide only temporary relief.
Physical exam findings include limited internal rotation of both hips (zero); a left anatomical short leg (tibial and femoral, 5mm total); diminished proprioception with 1 leg standing (<30 seconds). MRI reveals fatty infiltration of the lumbar spinal paraspinals and fibrotic changes within the musculature; degenerative changes in the L4 and L5 lumbar facet joints, degeneration of the L5-S1, L3-L4 and L2-L3 lumbar discs.
Now watch his gait again and come back here for more.
Did you see the following?
How did you do? If you didn’t see all those things, then you are missing pieces of the puzzle. Remember, often what you see is not what is wrong, but the compensation
The powers of observation of the subtle make the difference between good results and great ones.
Try some of these tips.
We are (and have been) here to help you be a better observer and a better clinician, coach, athlete, sales person, etc. If you haven’t already, join us here for some insightful posts each week; for our weekly (almost) PODcast on iTunes; follow us on Twitteror on Facebook: The Gait Guys
podcast link:
http://thegaitguys.libsyn.com/podcast-34-chimp-feet-marathon-monks-statin-drugs
iTunes link:
http://thegaitguys.libsyn.com/podcast-33-heart-beats-toe-walking-crawling
Gait Guys online /download store:
http://store.payloadz.com/results/results.aspx?m=80204
other web based Gait Guys lectures:
www.onlinece.com type in Dr. Waerlop or Dr. Allen Biomechanics
Today’s show notes:
1.Did Rock Climbing Help Us Start Walking Upright? By Shaunacy Ferro A new theory suggests humans became bipedal so that we could scramble up rugged terrain.
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-05/did-rock-climbing-help-us-start-walking-upright?src=SOC&dom=tw
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaih%C5%8Dgy%C5%8D
The Running Marathon monks of Mt. Hiei
The Kaihōgyō is a set of the ascetic physical endurance trainings for which the Japanese “marathon monks” of Mt. Hiei are known. These Japanese monks are from the Shugendō and the Tendai school of Buddhism, a denomination brought to Japan by the monk Saichō in 806 from China.
Do you have Chimpanzee feet ?
About 8% of people tested by Boston University researchers had midfoot flexibility of the sort that apes use to climb trees, according to a study published in the American Journal of Physical Anthropolgy.
Michael O'Riordan
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/805369?src=wnl_edit_medn_wir&spon=34
http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1691918
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/22/can-statins-curb-the-benefits-of-exercise/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23583255
5. Shoes: The Primal Professional.com
http://theprimalprofessional.com/products/pre-order-the-primal-professional
http://well.bradrourke.com/2013/05/my-new-primal-dress-shoes/
Marian T. Hannan
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.22040/abstract;jsessionid=99975015C3EE5678E6351273C2CD42A0.d02t04
http://www.kinetic-revolution.com/why-where-you-land-on-your-foot-isnt-that-important/
You must understand all 3 of these (see below) to understand funky gaits that you see, and to clean up your physical exams with clients. If you are making gait or running form recommendations on this stuff without understanding Torsions you are quite possibly making very bad form recommendations and could be putting forces and torque into foot, ankle, knee or hip that are detrimental. Trust us. We know what we are talking about.
In light of our teleseminar on Chirocredit.com last night we will re-run the 5 Part series on limb Torsions and Versions.
Remember, there are three areas this needs to be considered in:
1. torsion of the talus
2. tibial torsion
3. femoral torsion
here is the link to our old post on this topic, part 1a
http://thegaitguys.tumblr.com/post/30799942620/torsions-this-gentleman-has-2-excellent-examples
Shawn and Ivo
The “Top-End” Peroneal Walk Foot Skill: Another Restoration Foot Trick by The Gait Guys
Have stability problems in your ankles ? Lots of people do !
Here is a brief video of a simple, but difficult, functional exercise to strengthen the peroneal muscles in full plantar flexion (we will give more detailed tricks and techniques away on the Foot-Ankle DVD exercise series, once we get some time to get to it !). The key here is to not let the heel drop during single fore-foot loading and to keep the ankle pressing inwards as if to try and touch the ankles together medially …..if you feel the heel drop on the single foot loaded side (or you can feel the calf is weaker or if you feel strain to keep the inward press of the ankle) then it might be more than the peronei, it could be the combined peroneal-gastrocsoleus complex. The key to the assessment and home work is to make sure that the heel always stays in “top-end” heel rise plantarflexion. But you have to strongly consider the peronei just as seriously. Studies show that even single event sprains let alone chronic ankle sprains create serious incompetence of the peronei. Most people do not notice this because they never assess the ability to hold the foot in full heel rise (plantarflexion) while creating a valgus load (created by the peronei mostly, a less amount from the lateral calf) at the ankle. This is why repetitive sprains occur. The true key to recovery is to be able to walk on the foot in this heel-up “top-end” position while in ankle eversion (ankles squeezed together) as you see in this video. This is something we do with all of our basketball and jumping sports athletes and it is critical in our dancers of all kinds. And if they cannot do the walking skill or if they feel weakness then we keep it static and put a densely rolled towel or a small air filled ball between the ankles and have them do slow calf raises and descents while squeezing the towel-ball with all their ability. This will create a nice burn in the peroneal muscles after just a few repetitions. The user will also quickly become acutely aware of their old tendency to roll to the outside of the foot and ankle because of this lack of awareness and strength of those laterally placed ankle evertors - the peronei. It is critical to note that If you return to the ground from a jump and cannot FIRST load the forefoot squarely and then, and only then, control the rate of ankle inversion and neutral heel drop (ankle dorsiflexion) then you should not be shocked at chronic repetitive ankle sprains. Remember, the metatarsals and toes are shorter as we move away from the big toe, so there is already a huge risk and tendency to roll to the outside of the foot through ankle inversion. Hence why ankle sprains are so common. We call this “top end” peroneal strength but for it to be effectively implemented one must have sufficient top end calf strength as well, you cannot have sound loading mechanics without both.
It is not as easy as it appears in this video. We encourage you to give this a try and we bet that 1 out of every 2 people who try it will notice “top end” weakness felt either in the peronei and/or in the calf via inability to keep the heel in “top-end”. Oh, and do not think that you can simply correct this by more calf work, not if the peronei are involved, which they usually are.
One more trick by The Gait Guys………bet you cannot wait for the foot dvd huh !? Ya, it has only been on our list for 3 years now !
We talk more about this kind of stuff on our National Shoe Fit Certification program.
Email us if you are interested thegaitguys@gmail.com
A Window into the Glutes: Anatomy lesson for the day.
A rather literal statement for a rather literal picture. Taken from the Human Body Exhibit at the Denver Museum of Science, this picture offers us a glimpse into, or in this case through, one of our favorite muscle groups. This group that we see here, is probably our second favorite group. They are often called the “deep six” and are the deep hip external rotators. If you count, you will notice there are only five….one remains unseen the obturator internus. More on that later.
See the linear white lines on the right of the window? That’ s the two portions of the sciatic nerve. Notice how it runs under the muscle at the top and over the others? The muscle it runs under is the famous piriformis. When this muscle gets tight, it can impinge the sciatic nerve, causing pain down the leg (known as sciatica). This represents one of many causes of pain radiating down the leg.
The next muscle south is the gemelli superior, then the obturator externus, gemelli inferior, and quadratus femoris. The sixth of the deep six is the obturator internus, which runs from the inside of the pelvis on the obtrobturator foramen (those huge “eyes” you see in an x ray when looking at a pelvis from the front) to a similar place on the femur.
A few observations you should make.
We will see this post as a reference for some future posts on this most fascinating muscle groups. Until then, study up!
The Gait Guys. Uber Foot Geeks. Join us in our mission to educate the world on the importance of understanding human motion and its impact on translating us forward in the gravitational plane.
all material copyright 2013 The Gait Guys/ The Homunculus Group. All rights reserved
In searching our personal archives for neat stuff we came across an oldie but a goodie. We posted this one on the blog for the first time in July 2011 so it was time to revisit it here on the blogs “Rerun Fridays”. This is one to certainly make your head spin. We do not even know where this came from and how much was our original material and how much was someone else’s. If you can find the reference we would love to give it credit. We do now that we added some stuff to this but we don’t even know what parts were ours ! Regardless, there is a brain twister here worth juggling in your heads. Lets start with this thought……..
When you are sitting the rectus femoris (a quad muscle) is “theoretically” shortened because the hip is in flexion. It crosses the bent knee in the front at it blends with the patellar tendon, thus it is “theoretically” lengthened at the knee. When we stand up, the hip extends and the knee extends, making the R. Femoris “theoretically” lengthen at the hip and shorten at the knee. This, it bodes the question…….did the R. Femoris even change length at all ? And the hamstrings kind of go through the same phenomenon. It is part of the uniqueness of “two joint” muscles. Now, onto Lombard’s paradox with more in depth thought on this topic.
Warren Plimpton Lombard (1855-1939) sought to explain why the quadriceps and hamstring muscles contracted simultaneously during the sit-to-stand motion. He noted that the rectus femoris and the hamstrings are antagonistic, and this coactivation is known as Lombard’s paradox.
The paradox is classically explained by noting the relative moment arms of the hamstrings and rectus femoris at either the hip or the knee, and their effects on the magnitude of the moments produced by either muscle group at each of the two joints.
By virtue of the fact that muscles cannot develop different amounts of force in their different parts, the paradox develops. The hamstrings cannot selectively extend the hip without imparting an equal force at the knee. Thus, the only way for hip extension and knee extension to occur simultaneously in the act of standing (or eccentrically in the act of sitting) is for the net moment to be an extensor moment at both the hip and knee joints. Lombard suggested three necessary conditions for such paradoxical co-contraction:
In 1989, Felix Zajac & co-workers pointed out that the role of muscles, particularly two-joint muscles, was much more complex than has traditionally been assumed. For example, in certain situations, the gastrocnemius could act as a knee extensor. It is clear now that the direction in which a joint is accelerated depends on the dynamic state of all body segments, making it difficult to predict the effect of an individual muscle contraction without extensive and accurate biomechanical models (Zajac et al, 2003).
In fact, back to the gastrocnemius another 2+ joint muscle (crosses knee, mortise and subtalar joints), we all typically think of it as a “push off” muscle. It causes the heel to rise and accelerates push off in gait and running. But, when the foot is fixed on the ground the insertion is more stable and thus the contraction, because the origin is above the posterior joint line, can pull the femoral condyles into a posterior shear vector. It thus, like the hamstrings, needs to be adequately trained in a ACL or post-operative ACL, deficient knee to help reduce the anterior shear of normal joint loading. It is vital to note, that when ankle rocker is less than 90 degrees (less than 90 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion is available), knee hyperextension is a viable strategy to progress forward in the sagittal plane. But in this scenarios, the posterior shear capabilites of the gastrocnemius are brought to the front of the line as a frequent strategy. And not a good one for the menisci we should mention.
Andrews J G (1982) On the relationship between resultant joint torques and muscular activity Med Sci Sports Exerc 14: 361-367.
Andrews J G (1985) A general method for determining the functional role of a muscle J Biomech Eng 107: 348-353.
Bobbert MF, van Soest AJ (2000) Two-joint muscles offer the solution - but what was the problem? Motor Control 4: 48-52 & 97-116.
Gregor, R.J., Cavanagh, P.R., & LaFortune, M. (1985). Knee flexor moments during propulsion in cycling—a creative solution to Lombard’s Paradox. Journal of Biomechanics, 18, 307-16 .
Ingen-Schenau GJv (1989) From rotation to translation: constraints on multi-joint movement and the unique action of bi-articular muscles. Hum. Mov. Sci. 8:301-37.
Lombard, W.P., & Abbott, F.M. (1907). The mechanical effects produced by the contraction of individual muscles of the thigh of the frog. American Journal of Physiology, 20, 1-60.
Mansour J M & Pereira J M (1987) Quantitative functional anatomy of the lower limb with application to human gait J Biomech 20: 51-58.
Park S, Krebs DE, Mann RW (1999) Hip muscle co-contraction: evidence from concurrent in vivo pressure measurement and force estimation. Gait & Posture 10: 211-222.
Rasch, P.J., & Burke, R.K. (1978). Kinesiology and applied anatomy. (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Visser JJ, Hoogkamer JE, Bobbert MF & Huijing PA (1990) Length and Moment Arm of Human Leg Muscles as a Function of Knee and Hip Angles. Eur. J Appl Physiol 61: 453-460.
Zajac FE & Gordon MF (1989) Determining muscle’s force and action in multi-articular movement Exerc Sport Sci Revs 17: 187-230.
Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA (2003) Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking - Part II: Lessons from
dynamical simulations and clinical implications, Gait & Posure 17 (1): 1-17.
This web article just came out today and we felt it was important to share.
Nicole Crawford did a nice job with the article (LINK) and you need to read it. The pelvic floor is a complicated place. There needs to be balanced muscular contraction and there has to be neutral pelvis and lumbar spine. We have to agree with her comment:
A Kegel attempts to strengthen the pelvic floor, but it really only continues to pull the sacrum inward promoting even more weakness, and more PF (pelvic floor) gripping. The muscles that balance out the anterior pull on the sacrum are the glutes. A lack of glutes (having no butt) is what makes this group so much more susceptible to pelvic floor disorder (PFD). Zero lumbar curvature (missing the little curve at the small of the back) is the most telling sign that the pelvic floor is beginning to weaken. An easier way to say this is: Weak glutes + too many Kegels = PFD.
There are too many people who have a shallow lumbar spine lordotic curve. These folks often hold the pelvis as neutrally as they can by keeping a constant squeeze of the glutes to “push” the pelvis “tipped up or levelled up” in the front when in fact the lower abdominals should “hold” them up in the front, to a notable degree. It is easier for many to push the pelvis up with the glutes particularly when so many individuals are lacking in the abdominal compartment.
We have so many of our patients learn the “potty squat” where the buttock is pushed backwards in a proper squatting technique. We do this to reteach gluteal work, hamstring length in an environment of proper abdominal bracing. IT takes time to get the technique down, but it is worth it. And, Crawford’s article gives it even more validity with its effect on the sacral posturing and impairing pelvic floor tension.
There is much good information in this article by Crawford. It is worth everyone’s read. If you have been here with us on The Gait Guys for awhile you will know that we hold the mighty glutes on a high pedestal. They are absolute key in gait and many folks do not use them properly. After a few rough weeks practicing going gradually deeper as tissue length and strength is earned many of our patients have an epiphany of how little they were using their glutes, and how poorly they squat and how weak they were in the lower limbs. Even our elderly patients in their 70s and 80s benefit from early shallow potty squat progressions. We just put a chair behind them in case they fall back. It is never shocking to see what a few weeks of propper “potty-ing” will do to a person. Do them alot, and do them often.
Good potty-ing to ya’ll.
Shawn and Ivo………Kings of our own Potty Thrones
Here is Crawford’s article link once again.
http://breakingmuscle.com/womens-fitness/stop-doing-kegels-real-pelvic-floor-advice-women-and-men
When you are sitting the rectus femoris (a quad muscle) is “theoretically” shortened at the hip because the hip is in flexion. It also crosses the bent knee in the front at it blends with the patellar tendon, thus it is “theoretically” lengthened at the knee. When we stand up, the hip extends and the knee extends, making the R. Femoris “theoretically” lengthen at the hip and shorten at the knee. Thus, it bodes the question…….did the R. Femoris even change length at all ? Did a concentric event occur at one end and an eccentric contractile event occur at the other ? Is that even possible ? And, the hamstrings kind of go through the same phenomenon on the other side of the knee and hip so you possibly have a very complex dialogue across the front and the back of the knee and hip during movement. And for every angle of flexion or extension change around the knee or hip both the quads and the hamstrings have this sliding scale of change they have to play, it should be a perfect give and take phenomenon. And when orchestrated cleanly the joints do not see impairment. This is part of the uniqueness of “two joint” muscles. However, think about how a short quadriceps, a very common clinical finding, will impair this orchestra. Like an instrument out of tune the orchestration is in flux and alternative strategies ensue. How will the function at the knee be changed by this short quadriceps ? How will hip extension be impaired ? How will the hamstring alter its function ? What will the consequences be ? What alternative motor patterns will be deployed ? And if you are just doing your gait analysis without a clinical examination what will you see as their compensation ? Now that your head is buzzing, onto Lombard’s paradox with more in depth thought on this topic.
Warren Plimpton Lombard (1855-1939) sought to explain why the quadriceps and hamstring muscles contracted simultaneously during the sit-to-stand motion. He noted that the rectus femoris and the hamstrings are antagonistic, and this coactivation is known as Lombard’s paradox.
The paradox is classically explained by noting the relative moment arms of the hamstrings and rectus femoris at either the hip or the knee, and their effects on the magnitude of the moments produced by either muscle group at each of the two joints.
By virtue of the fact that muscles cannot develop different amounts of force in their different parts, the paradox develops. The hamstrings cannot selectively extend the hip without imparting an equal force at the knee. Thus, the only way for hip extension and knee extension to occur simultaneously in the act of standing (or eccentrically in the act of sitting) is for the net moment to be an extensor moment at both the hip and knee joints. Lombard suggested three necessary conditions for such paradoxical co-contraction:
In 1989, Felix Zajac & co-workers pointed out that the role of muscles, particularly two-joint muscles, was much more complex than has traditionally been assumed. For example, in certain situations, the gastrocnemius could act as a knee extensor. It is clear now that the direction in which a joint is accelerated depends on the dynamic state of all body segments, making it difficult to predict the effect of an individual muscle contraction without extensive and accurate biomechanical models (Zajac et al, 2003).
In fact, back to the gastrocnemius another 2+ joint muscle (crosses knee, mortise and subtalar joints), we all typically think of it as a “push off” muscle. It causes the heel to rise and accelerates push off in gait and running. But, when the foot is fixed on the ground the insertion is more stable and thus the contraction, because the origin is above the posterior joint line, can pull the femoral condyles into a posterior shear vector. It thus, like the hamstrings, needs to be adequately trained in a ACL or post-operative ACL, deficient knee to help reduce the anterior shear of normal joint loading. It is vital to note, that when ankle rocker is less than 90 degrees (less than 90 degrees of ankle dorsiflexion is available), knee hyperextension is a viable strategy to progress forward over the ankle in the sagittal plane. But in this scenario, the posterior shear capabilites of the gastrocnemius are brought to the front of the line as a frequent strategy. And not a good one for the menisci we should mention.
Just some random thoughts for you today. We used to play such mental games during my orthopedic residency. The “what would happen if” scenarios. They stimulate thought, dialogue and debate and get the brain thinking more globally. We hope you enjoyed the circus show today !
Shawn and Ivo…….. the gait guys
Andrews J G (1982) On the relationship between resultant joint torques and muscular activity Med Sci Sports Exerc 14: 361-367.
Andrews J G (1985) A general method for determining the functional role of a muscle J Biomech Eng 107: 348-353.
Bobbert MF, van Soest AJ (2000) Two-joint muscles offer the solution - but what was the problem? Motor Control 4: 48-52 & 97-116.
Gregor, R.J., Cavanagh, P.R., & LaFortune, M. (1985). Knee flexor moments during propulsion in cycling—a creative solution to Lombard’s Paradox. Journal of Biomechanics, 18, 307-16 .
Ingen-Schenau GJv (1989) From rotation to translation: constraints on multi-joint movement and the unique action of bi-articular muscles. Hum. Mov. Sci. 8:301-37.
Lombard, W.P., & Abbott, F.M. (1907). The mechanical effects produced by the contraction of individual muscles of the thigh of the frog. American Journal of Physiology, 20, 1-60.
Mansour J M & Pereira J M (1987) Quantitative functional anatomy of the lower limb with application to human gait J Biomech 20: 51-58.
Park S, Krebs DE, Mann RW (1999) Hip muscle co-contraction: evidence from concurrent in vivo pressure measurement and force estimation. Gait & Posture 10: 211-222.
Rasch, P.J., & Burke, R.K. (1978). Kinesiology and applied anatomy. (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Visser JJ, Hoogkamer JE, Bobbert MF & Huijing PA (1990) Length and Moment Arm of Human Leg Muscles as a Function of Knee and Hip Angles. Eur. J Appl Physiol 61: 453-460.
Zajac FE & Gordon MF (1989) Determining muscle’s force and action in multi-articular movement Exerc Sport Sci Revs 17: 187-230.
Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA (2003) Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking - Part II: Lessons from
dynamical simulations and clinical implications, Gait & Posure 17 (1): 1-17.
We think track speed work has value. Just in modest amounts. One can use the curves to train the ankles and chains as we mentioned in today’s earlier blog post. Then, reverse the track speedwork to hit the opposite sides as mentioned in the blog.
We spend so much time running in a straight line that we lose the frontal plane (side to side) muscle skills and strength and hence develop risk for the dreaded “Cross Over Gait” (type that into the SEARCH box on the blog). We, as runners, desperately need this frontal plane strength. So rather than abolish the track, use it sparingly and effectively. Train smarter not harder. Drive symmetry. Thanks for reading today gang !
Shawn and Ivo
Clin J Sport Med. 2000 Oct;10(4):245-50.
Asymmetrical strength changes and injuries in athletes training on a small radius curve indoor track.
Beukeboom C, Birmingham TB, Forwell L, Ohrling D.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
1) To evaluate strength changes in the hindfoot invertor and evertor muscle groups of athletes training and competing primarily in the counterclockwise direction on an indoor, unbanked track, and 2) to observe injuries occurring in these same runners over the course of an indoor season.
DESIGN:
Prospective observational study.
SETTING:
Fowler-Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
PARTICIPANTS:
A convenience sample of 25 intercollegiate, long sprinters (200-600 m) and middle distance runners (800-3,000 m) competing and training with the 1995-1996 University of Western Ontario Track and Field team.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
A standardized protocol using the Cybex 6000 isokinetic dynamometer was used to measure peak torques of the hindfoot invertor and evertor muscle groups of both limbs using concentric and eccentric contractions performed at angular velocities of 60, 120, and 300 degrees/sec. Changes in peak torques between the preseason and postseason values were calculated and compared using a repeated measures analysis of variance test. Injury reports were collected by student athletic trainers and in the Sport Medicine and Physiotherapy clinic.
RESULTS:
Primary analysis indicated that the left (inside limb) invertors increased in strength significantly more than the right (outside limb) invertors (p = 0.01), while the right evertors increased in strength significantly more than the left evertors (p = 0.04). A high incidence of lower extremity injury (68%) occurred in this sample of runners, corresponding to an injury rate of 0.75 injuries per 100 person-hours of sport exposure. Although sample size was limited, secondary analysis indicated that strength changes were not significantly different for injured (n = 17) and uninjured (n = 8) runners (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:
The observed small, but statistically significant, asymmetrical changes in strength of the hindfoot invertor and evertor muscle groups can best be described as a training effect. Altered biomechanics proposed to occur in the stance foot while running on the curve of the track are discussed in relation to the observed strength imbalance. A causal link between strength changes and lower extremity injuries cannot be inferred from this study, but suggestions for further research are made.
So, what kind of shoes do I put this guy in?
The answer is, well…it depends.
This gentleman has a large Q angle (need to know more about Q angles? click here). The second photo is taken from above looking down at his knee.
If he has medial (inside) knee pain (possibly from shear forces), you would want to unload the medial knee, so a more flexible shoe that would allow more pronation of the foot and INCREASE the amount of valgus would open the medial joint space and probably be more appropriate.
If he had lateral (outside) knee pain (possibly from compressive forces), then a shoe with more support (like a motion control shoe) would help to unload the lateral knee and create more space may be appropriate. And that just covers the local knee issue. What if he has a pes planus and needs more than a “more stable” shoe ? And, what if that pes planus is rigid and won’t accept a more rigid arch supporting device ? What are you gonna do then ?
The caveat?
There are no hard and fast rules AND there is no substitute for examining the person and asking LOTS of questions BEFORE putting them in a shoe. You must approach each case on a case-by-case basis with all factors brought into the fold to make the best clinical decision. Simply watching them walk, as you have heard it over and over again here on The Gait Guys, will lead you into wrong assumptions much of the time. Sometimes the obvious fix is not possible or won’t be tolerated by the person’s foot, knee, hip or body. So, sometimes you have to settle with something in-between.
Need to, or dying to, know more? Take our 3 part National Shoe Fit Program and be a shoe guru!
Email us at thegaitguys@gmail.com for details.
So, what’s in a test? The standing tripod test
What do we see here?
top picture, L leg
middle picture, R leg
Bottom picture
Some questions for you:
Q: why does he have a pelvic shift to the left in both r and L leg standing?
A: look at the feet. He is able t make a better tripod on the L foot, probably because of the prominence of the head of the 1st metatarsal. also note the valgus angulation of the knee, which helps to shift the center of mass to the midline. this is most likely a long term compensation
Q: Why does he have more body lean to the R during r leg standing?
A: see previous question AND he probably has weaker hip abductor muscles on the right
Q: did you notice that the hand and forearm were more supinated in the top (L standing) picture than the middle (r standing) picture (where he is more pronated)? What gives?
A: Wow, this is some subtle stuff, eh? Look to the brain. remember coordinate arm swing? (if not, look here and here) Supination accesses more of the extensors of the arm and pronation more of the flexors. When we have less extensor activity (remember flexor dominance? if not, click here) you have a tendency to use your flexors more to compensate (you use what you have available to you). It appears that he has a much tougher time standing on his r leg (judging from the increased compensation)
Q: Wow, nice floors! Are they hardwood?
A: No, laminate
The Gait Guys. Helping you help others each and every post. Keep your eyes and your mind open : )
We have been seeing, addressing and treating this problem for years, far too many years. There are few things that frustrate us more than coaches and athletes who refuse to alternate their track workouts into the clockwise direction to help avoid the repetitious detrimental training effects of continued and repeated counterclockwise track training.
Here is a study from 2000 that tends to validate a causal link to our point. The study confirms a statistically significant asymmetrical strength development in the hindfoot invertor and evertor muscle groups.
Imbalances are a frequent and well known cause of injury. Consciously driving this asymmetry is the equivalent to purposefully encouraging injury if you as us. Why anyone would not heed recommendations to balance out workout effects is beyond us. We encourage road work so that there are no repetitive track banks to negotiate and thus knowingly drive asymmetry. When weather makes outdoor work an impossibility then days should ideally alternate the flow on the track to counter the direction of the previous day. And as track event days get closer then the inevitable will occur that you want to simulate race day direction but at least deeply engrained (skill, endurance and strength) training effects in the counterclockwise direction will not terribly risk injury as much as if there had been no training changes and accommodations.
The smaller the track radius the more detrimental the training effects. Frequency and duration of the training further magnifies training effects. A banked track will mute some of the effects but not all of them.
So why not just reverse the direction of your track training ? And don’t tell is it is logistically too difficult to coordinate, that is a lame excuse. You are training yourself or your athletes to be better runners, so you should want to reduce risks and optimize training effects. Period.
Shawn and Ivo……… The Gait Guys
Clin J Sport Med. 2000 Oct;10(4):245-50.
Asymmetrical strength changes and injuries in athletes training on a small radius curve indoor track.
Beukeboom C, Birmingham TB, Forwell L, Ohrling D.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
1) To evaluate strength changes in the hindfoot invertor and evertor muscle groups of athletes training and competing primarily in the counterclockwise direction on an indoor, unbanked track, and 2) to observe injuries occurring in these same runners over the course of an indoor season.
DESIGN:
Prospective observational study.
SETTING:
Fowler-Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
PARTICIPANTS:
A convenience sample of 25 intercollegiate, long sprinters (200-600 m) and middle distance runners (800-3,000 m) competing and training with the 1995-1996 University of Western Ontario Track and Field team.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
A standardized protocol using the Cybex 6000 isokinetic dynamometer was used to measure peak torques of the hindfoot invertor and evertor muscle groups of both limbs using concentric and eccentric contractions performed at angular velocities of 60, 120, and 300 degrees/sec. Changes in peak torques between the preseason and postseason values were calculated and compared using a repeated measures analysis of variance test. Injury reports were collected by student athletic trainers and in the Sport Medicine and Physiotherapy clinic.
RESULTS:
Primary analysis indicated that the left (inside limb) invertors increased in strength significantly more than the right (outside limb) invertors (p = 0.01), while the right evertors increased in strength significantly more than the left evertors (p = 0.04). A high incidence of lower extremity injury (68%) occurred in this sample of runners, corresponding to an injury rate of 0.75 injuries per 100 person-hours of sport exposure. Although sample size was limited, secondary analysis indicated that strength changes were not significantly different for injured (n = 17) and uninjured (n = 8) runners (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:
The observed small, but statistically significant, asymmetrical changes in strength of the hindfoot invertor and evertor muscle groups can best be described as a training effect. Altered biomechanics proposed to occur in the stance foot while running on the curve of the track are discussed in relation to the observed strength imbalance. A causal link between strength changes and lower extremity injuries cannot be inferred from this study, but suggestions for further research are made.
The Gait Guys. Making sure you are firing on all your cylinders (or walking on all 3 points of the tripod).
Want to know more? Consider taking the 3 part National Shoe Fit Program. Email us at thegaitguys@gmail.com for more details.
It has been a year since we posted this one on our blog, one of our 900 articles written by your’s truly. And as we were working on another new post while gulping our newest bio-hack (bulletproof coffee= micotoxin free coffee beans + grass fed butter and MCT oil all blended to a foamy delicious brain drink courtesy of our friend Dave Asprey over at the Bulletproofexec) we felt that our article wouldn’t be at the level we wanted it so we remembered “The Coffee Walkers” post we did 12 months ago. Here it is in its original caffeinated form. Enjoy.
———-
It sounds like some creepy Steven King inspired blog post today (reminds us of the Tommy Knockers). However, the truth of the matter is that this is a gait blog post on walking.
Why is it so hard to walk with a cup of “joe” or a coffee mug of anything liquid for that matter ? It is all about physics and wave frequency.
In a neat little article written by Natalie Wolchover for CNBC.com she says,
“New research shows that “the properties of mugs, legs and liquid conspire to cause spills, most often at some point between your seventh and tenth step. So says a pair of fluid physicists at the University of California at Santa Barbara.”
This is a physics problem actually. It is one of frequencies to be precise. Apparently the human stride has almost exactly the right frequency and amplitude to drive the natural oscillations of a liquid when it is in a classic shaped and sized coffee mug. The frequency of the liquid sloshing to and fro in your mug has the same frequency as your gait. So, when you are walking with your mug-of-Joe there is an additive effect of the two frequencies and apparently the more steps that are taken the effect eventually summates until the lip of the mug is exceeded. Stopping or slowing down once the ride is underway and the summation effect is changed, but not necessarily reversed. A sudden change in the frequency, such as you suddenly stopping, slowing or speeding up, can abruptly change the effect on the mug however the fluid within the vessel is not changed at the same rate and thus it can breach the edge of the mug.
According Wolchover, of one of the linked articles,
“Coffee drinkers often attempt to walk quickly with their cups, as if they might manage to reach their destination before their sloshing java waves reach a critical height. This method is scientifically flawed. It turns out that the faster you walk, the closer your gait comes to the natural sloshing frequency of coffee. To avoid driving the oscillations that lead to a spillage, walk slowly.” The other valid suggestions were to watch the mug and to accelerate slowly.
We take the easier route. Maybe we are smarter, maybe lazier, and maybe just tired of always analyzing things … . . we choose a container with a damn lid. Can you say “Einstein-ian” ? We don’t like coffee sloshing on our clothes or rugs.
Shawn and Ivo ………… jacked up on Joe. Get you never thought we would be able to turn coffee-talk into a gait article huh ? And you thought we would run out of gait stuff to talk about !
Article links that provided the inspiration for today’s post, and that we referenced.
http://esciencenews.com/articles/2012/06/04/rhythmic.firing.nerve.cells.involved.bodys.movements
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47364282/ns/technology_and_science-science/#.T-OZQXBPH4g
From time to time we get asked, why have you guys focused so intently on gait ? Our answer is always the same. It is the most frequently engaged motor pattern that the body does other than breathing. Without the ability to walk our health declines on many levels. And, because gait impacts every aspect of the human organism when it comes to locomotion. All too often gait is thought of as what the feet are doing. We see this as evidenced by how many shoe stores still just do a foot treadmill video analysis, but thankfully, many stores have gotten the message from somewhere that the rest of the body is vital to the assessment as well. However, how many of you are capturing the head on your gait analysis ? The head is where the software exists. Balance, visual, many proprioceptive centers, auditory and the processing of these and more are all located north of all of the other body parts.
We have done many previous blog posts on the visual and auditory centers and how they impact gait. You can goto our blog and type these into our SEARCH box and read more about these topics however today we wanted to share with you an article that is a few years older to show that there are many predictive gait parameters that are pre-calculated and have a huge determining effect and outcome on one’s gait.
Anticipatory head movements during turns, whether running on a banked track, taking tight turns on your local road, trail running on the side of slopes or even when biking and trail riding, all occur in order to gather advance visual information about the trajectory and potential obstacles. Below is an abstract that pretty much speaks for itself and you should read it. In the study they investigate the relationship between head and trunk movements during ambulation. They discuss how the head makes its calculated turn prior to the trunk turning, setting up the body for a proper negotiation of the banking of the turn thus gathering “visual information about the trajectory and potential obstacles”.
If you are truly a gait geek, you should get a little warm and fuzzy about this. And if you do not, well, you might still be a gait geek if you think a bit further about this and understand that cervical spine stability and mobility can negatively or positively affect the outcome. It just goes to prove once again, if you are going to address someones gait, you better have a clinical examination as part of their gait assessment if you want to truly find out where their impairment exists, and hides. If you depend solely on video, you are most likely giving advice on missing information, this we pretty much promise you. For example, we recall a younger lady from a few years ago, a patient of ours, who was left with unilateral deafness from a vaccine complication (MMR vaccine). She would always have her better ear turned more forward to gain an auditory edge to her hearing loss on the opposite side (we all do the same thing when we are talking to someone in a loud place). What we noticed, and what she was unaware of, what that this impaired her arm swing bilaterally making the one side swing more and the other less (which was a huge clue into her shoulder problem that she was seeing us for). This in turn, because they are neurologically connected by reflexive locomotion patterns, impaired swing and stance phases of her gait on both sides. It just goes to prove our point earlier, and to further make the point that, you cannot impact symmetry in one place and not expect that the body will not compensate for that asymmetry elsewhere. It is all connected … . you know the song.
If you are a gait geek, you can see the entire picture of the human organism clearer than many others.
Enjoy the whole abstract below for the great details by Sreenivasa et al.
* Shawn and Ivo …….. not your average wild and crazy guys……unless there is a gait topic to talk about.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Nov;191(3):313-20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1525-3. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
Walking along curved paths of different angles: the relationship between head and trunk turning.
Sreenivasa MN, Frissen I, Souman JL, Ernst MO.
Source
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Abstract
Walking along a curved path requires coordinated motor actions of the entire body. Here, we investigate the relationship between head and trunk movements during walking. Previous studies have found that the head systematically turns into turns before the trunk does. This has been found to occur at a constant distance rather than at a constant time before a turn. We tested whether this anticipatory head behavior is spatially invariant for turns of different angles. Head and trunk positions and orientations were measured while participants walked around obstacles in 45 degrees, 90 degrees, 135 degrees or 180 degrees turns. The radius of the turns was either imposed or left free. We found that the head started to turn into the direction of the turn at a constant distance before the obstacle (approximately 1.1 m) for turn angles up to 135 degrees . During turns, the head was consistently oriented more into the direction of the turn than the trunk. This difference increased for larger turning angles and reached its maximum later in the turn for larger turns. Walking speeds decreased monotonically for increasing turn angles. Imposing fixed turn radii only affected the point at which the trunk started to turn into a turn. Our results support the view that anticipatory head movements during turns occur in order to gather advance visual information about the trajectory and potential obstacles.
What foot type do we have here?
OK, so this gentlemen comes in with knee pain, L > R and an interesting “jog” in his gait from midstance to toe off (ie, the 2nd half of his gait cycle).
A few questions for you:
Q: What foot type does he have?
A: Forefoot valgus, L > R. The forefoot is everted with respect to the rear foot. Need to brush up? click here and here for a refresher
Q: What is the next question you should be asking?
A: Is it a rigid deformity (ie the 1st ray is “stuck” in plantar flexion or flexible (ie, the 1st ray can move into dorsiflexion. Hint: look for a callus under the base of the big toe in a rigid deformity
Q: Which is the best type of shoe for this person? Motion control, guidance or neutral?
A: most likely, neutral. A motion control shoe will usually keep the foot in more relative inversion, and that may be a bad thing for this person. Mobility is key, so a flexible shoe would probably be best.
Q: Would a conventional or zero drop shoe be appropriate?
A: A conventional shoe, with a higher ramp delta, will most likely accentuate the deformity (especially if it is a rigid deformity). This is for at least 2 reasons: 1. plantar flexion is part of supination (due to the higher heel; remember plantar flexion, inversion and adduction) and this will make the foot more rigid. 2. The medial side of the foot will be hitting the ground 1st; if the 1st ray is in plantar flexion, this will be accentuated.
The Gait Guys. Foot Nerds to the max. Convincing you to join forces with us in spreading the word and gait literacy. LIke this post? tell others! Don’t like this post? Tell us!
Need to know more? Take our National Shoe Fit Program and get certified! email us at thegaitguys@gmail.com for details.
podcast link:
http://thegaitguys.libsyn.com/podcast-31-walking-straight-matalgia-queen
iTunes link:
http://thegaitguys.libsyn.com/podcast-33-heart-beats-toe-walking-crawling
Gait Guys online /download store:
http://store.payloadz.com/results/results.aspx?m=80204
other web based Gait Guys lectures:
www.onlinece.com type in Dr. Waerlop or Dr. Allen Biomechanics
Today’s show notes:
Neuroscience Pieces:
http://mashable.com/2013/05/06/mask-superhuman/
http://vimeo.com/58771063#
Kickstart from Cadence Biomedical is designed to help improve the gait of people who have difficulty walking and help them regain their mobility and independence. But unlike its robotic cousins that are powered by weighty rechargeable batteries, the Kickstart is able to ditch the batteries altogether because it has no motors to power. Instead, it is purely mechanical and provides assistance by storing and releasing kinetic energy generated by a person when walking.
http://www.cnet.com.au/printable-bionic-ear-sends-hearing-to-the-dogs-339344149.htm
http://www.runnersworld.com/health/how-many-heart-beats-do-we-get
HI: Can you tell us what role the gluteus medius plays in foot pronation. What if they are weak or tight? And how about the QL, too? Would a foot supinator have weakened QLs (they don’t get to work much) and a foot overpronator have over-worked/loaded QLs (controlling spin)? And hey, if I toss in functional scoliosis in the lumbar region to this mix, well, what a tight mess I have, eh? Any insights on how to become unscrewed?
Hi there, I’m sure you get 100,000 messages so thank you for your time for reading this! Today I had a revelation that I have external tibial torsion. After much googling about my knees turning in quite a lot when my feet are straight I finally found it! Then I found your blog on Tumblr and read all about it and watched the videos. I just wondered if you had any advice on running, I am keen to start running but I didn’t know whether to run with my feet sticking out as my natural position or anything else I should be doing? I also wondered if it can be corrected marginally by doing any strength exercises? Thank you for your help in advance! Karis
_______
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=crawling-may-be-unnecessary
OUR SEARCH BOX IS INTUITIVE, TYPE IN YOUR KEY WORD, WAIT, THEN SCROLL DOWN.
Email us: our email is found under the "Disclaimer" Tab above.
Powered by Squarespace.